(10-13-2024, 04:54 PM)Lynyrd Skynyrd Wrote:

(10-13-2024, 03:31 PM)quintessentone Wrote:

(10-12-2024, 05:29 PM)Lynyrd Skynyrd Wrote:

(10-12-2024, 02:15 PM)quintessentone Wrote:

(10-12-2024, 12:07 AM)Lynyrd Skynyrd Wrote: He's posted his professional credentials on LinkedIn. There are ways to check out people on Twitter, and test their credibility. He sets up geo-fences and does an analysis of the devices that are broadcasting. There are also published reports of people traveling on buses to a series of Kamala Harris rallies and being paid $100/day.

There is a big difference as to professional credibility vs. biased posting.

I'm not sure that understand your point. Are you suggesting that a digital data specialist, who sets up geo-fences professionally is a liar? Are you saying he didn't capture all those Harris rally cell signals, and didn't analyze them honestly?

Did you want to get into a discussion about inserting one's biases into one's analysis of anything and everything?

Maybe you don't understand the technology? A cell phone has an unique identity. If it connects to a cell signal source a record exists. There is no room for bias in the analysis. Either the record exists or it doesn't.

(10-16-2024, 09:07 AM)quintessentone Wrote:

(10-13-2024, 04:54 PM)Lynyrd Skynyrd Wrote:

(10-13-2024, 03:31 PM)quintessentone Wrote:

(10-12-2024, 05:29 PM)Lynyrd Skynyrd Wrote:

(10-12-2024, 02:15 PM)quintessentone Wrote: There is a big difference as to professional credibility vs. biased posting.

I'm not sure that understand your point. Are you suggesting that a digital data specialist, who sets up geo-fences professionally is a liar? Are you saying he didn't capture all those Harris rally cell signals, and didn't analyze them honestly?

Did you want to get into a discussion about inserting one's biases into one's analysis of anything and everything?

Maybe you don't understand the technology? A cell phone has an unique identity. If it connects to a cell signal source a record exists. There is no room for bias in the analysis. Either the record exists or it doesn't.

The bias is obvious because he didn't bother to do the same data capture and analysis of any of Trump's rallies. Polls and data can be manipulated in many ways to get the desired end result.

How about a fact check or is that not something you do?

https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/buses-used-security-harris-charlotte-rally-not-transport-2024-09-23/

(10-21-2024, 06:00 AM)Lynyrd Skynyrd Wrote:

(10-16-2024, 09:07 AM)quintessentone Wrote:

(10-13-2024, 04:54 PM)Lynyrd Skynyrd Wrote:

(10-13-2024, 03:31 PM)quintessentone Wrote:

(10-12-2024, 05:29 PM)Lynyrd Skynyrd Wrote: I'm not sure that understand your point. Are you suggesting that a digital data specialist, who sets up geo-fences professionally is a liar? Are you saying he didn't capture all those Harris rally cell signals, and didn't analyze them honestly?

Did you want to get into a discussion about inserting one's biases into one's analysis of anything and everything?

Maybe you don't understand the technology? A cell phone has an unique identity. If it connects to a cell signal source a record exists. There is no room for bias in the analysis. Either the record exists or it doesn't.

The bias is obvious because he didn't bother to do the same data capture and analysis of any of Trump's rallies. Polls and data can be manipulated in many ways to get the desired end result.

How about a fact check or is that not something you do?

https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/buses-used-security-harris-charlotte-rally-not-transport-2024-09-23/

It's widely reported that the Harris /Walz team is paying and  busing thousands of people long distances to her rallies. Don't provide a tainted Reuters story to try and refute that.

https://yandex.com/search/pad/?text=bus+kamala+rally&lr=102627

(10-21-2024, 07:13 PM)quintessentone Wrote:

(10-21-2024, 06:00 AM)Lynyrd Skynyrd Wrote:

(10-16-2024, 09:07 AM)quintessentone Wrote:

(10-13-2024, 04:54 PM)Lynyrd Skynyrd Wrote:

(10-13-2024, 03:31 PM)quintessentone Wrote: Did you want to get into a discussion about inserting one's biases into one's analysis of anything and everything?

Maybe you don't understand the technology? A cell phone has an unique identity. If it connects to a cell signal source a record exists. There is no room for bias in the analysis. Either the record exists or it doesn't.

The bias is obvious because he didn't bother to do the same data capture and analysis of any of Trump's rallies. Polls and data can be manipulated in many ways to get the desired end result.

How about a fact check or is that not something you do?

https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/buses-used-security-harris-charlotte-rally-not-transport-2024-09-23/

It's widely reported that the Harris /Walz team is paying and  busing thousands of people long distances to her rallies. Don't provide a tainted Reuters story to try and refute that.

https://yandex.com/search/pad/?text=bus+kamala+rally&lr=102627

Reuters is tainted? Oh right, any other narrative with evidence is tainted, I forgot.

(10-22-2024, 01:48 AM)Lynyrd Skynyrd Wrote:

(10-21-2024, 07:13 PM)quintessentone Wrote:

(10-21-2024, 06:00 AM)Lynyrd Skynyrd Wrote:

(10-16-2024, 09:07 AM)quintessentone Wrote:

(10-13-2024, 04:54 PM)Lynyrd Skynyrd Wrote: Maybe you don't understand the technology? A cell phone has an unique identity. If it connects to a cell signal source a record exists. There is no room for bias in the analysis. Either the record exists or it doesn't.

The bias is obvious because he didn't bother to do the same data capture and analysis of any of Trump's rallies. Polls and data can be manipulated in many ways to get the desired end result.

How about a fact check or is that not something you do?

https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/buses-used-security-harris-charlotte-rally-not-transport-2024-09-23/

It's widely reported that the Harris /Walz team is paying and  busing thousands of people long distances to her rallies. Don't provide a tainted Reuters story to try and refute that.

https://yandex.com/search/pad/?text=bus+kamala+rally&lr=102627

Reuters is tainted? Oh right, any other narrative with evidence is tainted, I forgot.

Of the 5,003 mobile devices at Kamala Harris's post-debate rally in North Carolina, 3,600 originated from Georgia. The majority were from Atlanta, while just under one-sixth were from Savannah.

https://www.offthepress.com/data-reveals-many-repeat-customers-at-kamalas-rallies/

(10-23-2024, 05:08 PM)quintessentone Wrote:

(10-22-2024, 01:48 AM)Lynyrd Skynyrd Wrote:

(10-21-2024, 07:13 PM)quintessentone Wrote:

(10-21-2024, 06:00 AM)Lynyrd Skynyrd Wrote:

(10-16-2024, 09:07 AM)quintessentone Wrote: The bias is obvious because he didn't bother to do the same data capture and analysis of any of Trump's rallies. Polls and data can be manipulated in many ways to get the desired end result.

How about a fact check or is that not something you do?

https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/buses-used-security-harris-charlotte-rally-not-transport-2024-09-23/

It's widely reported that the Harris /Walz team is paying and  busing thousands of people long distances to her rallies. Don't provide a tainted Reuters story to try and refute that.

https://yandex.com/search/pad/?text=bus+kamala+rally&lr=102627

Reuters is tainted? Oh right, any other narrative with evidence is tainted, I forgot.

Of the 5,003 mobile devices at Kamala Harris's post-debate rally in North Carolina, 3,600 originated from Georgia. The majority were from Atlanta, while just under one-sixth were from Savannah.

https://www.offthepress.com/data-reveals-many-repeat-customers-at-kamalas-rallies/

You have failed to address my other point. Why weren't the mobile devices at Trump's rallies also geo-locate-pinged for an unbiased view of both scenarios?

(10-23-2024, 08:49 PM)Lynyrd Skynyrd Wrote:

(10-23-2024, 05:08 PM)quintessentone Wrote:

(10-22-2024, 01:48 AM)Lynyrd Skynyrd Wrote:

(10-21-2024, 07:13 PM)quintessentone Wrote:

(10-21-2024, 06:00 AM)Lynyrd Skynyrd Wrote: It's widely reported that the Harris /Walz team is paying and  busing thousands of people long distances to her rallies. Don't provide a tainted Reuters story to try and refute that.

https://yandex.com/search/pad/?text=bus+kamala+rally&lr=102627

Reuters is tainted? Oh right, any other narrative with evidence is tainted, I forgot.

Of the 5,003 mobile devices at Kamala Harris's post-debate rally in North Carolina, 3,600 originated from Georgia. The majority were from Atlanta, while just under one-sixth were from Savannah.

https://www.offthepress.com/data-reveals-many-repeat-customers-at-kamalas-rallies/

You have failed to address my other point. Why weren't the mobile devices at Trump's rallies also geo-locate-pinged for an unbiased view of both scenarios?

There have never been accusations that Trump's rally crowds are not genuine, but they are hundreds of accounts of Harris's team recruiting, paying and busing people to her events.

(10-26-2024, 12:32 PM)Maxmars Wrote: Because they firmly believe that all that truly matters is the "appearance.'
So much so, they lost all "substance."

(10-30-2024, 12:37 PM)quintessentone Wrote:

(10-26-2024, 12:32 PM)Maxmars Wrote: Because they firmly believe that all that truly matters is the "appearance.'
So much so, they lost all "substance."

A psychiatrist explained Trump's crowd size importance is hopelessly woven into his self-worth and ego.

If Trump wins he goes into the White House with an enemies list.

If Harris wins she goes into the White House with a 'to do' list.