10-16-2024, 09:07 AM
This post was last modified 10-16-2024, 09:17 AM by quintessentone. Edited 2 times in total. Edited 2 times in total. 
(10-13-2024, 04:54 PM)Lynyrd Skynyrd Wrote:(10-13-2024, 03:31 PM)quintessentone Wrote:Maybe you don't understand the technology? A cell phone has an unique identity. If it connects to a cell signal source a record exists. There is no room for bias in the analysis. Either the record exists or it doesn't.(10-12-2024, 05:29 PM)Lynyrd Skynyrd Wrote:(10-12-2024, 02:15 PM)quintessentone Wrote:(10-12-2024, 12:07 AM)Lynyrd Skynyrd Wrote: He's posted his professional credentials on LinkedIn. There are ways to check out people on Twitter, and test their credibility. He sets up geo-fences and does an analysis of the devices that are broadcasting. There are also published reports of people traveling on buses to a series of Kamala Harris rallies and being paid $100/day.
There is a big difference as to professional credibility vs. biased posting.
I'm not sure that understand your point. Are you suggesting that a digital data specialist, who sets up geo-fences professionally is a liar? Are you saying he didn't capture all those Harris rally cell signals, and didn't analyze them honestly?
Did you want to get into a discussion about inserting one's biases into one's analysis of anything and everything?
The bias is obvious because he didn't bother to do the same data capture and analysis of any of Trump's rallies. Polls and data can be manipulated in many ways to get the desired end result.
How about a fact check or is that not something you do?
https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/buses...024-09-23/
"It is the first responsibility of every citizen to question authority." Benjamin Franklin