10-23-2024, 08:49 PM
(10-23-2024, 05:08 PM)quintessentone Wrote:(10-22-2024, 01:48 AM)Lynyrd Skynyrd Wrote:(10-21-2024, 07:13 PM)quintessentone Wrote:(10-21-2024, 06:00 AM)Lynyrd Skynyrd Wrote:(10-16-2024, 09:07 AM)quintessentone Wrote: The bias is obvious because he didn't bother to do the same data capture and analysis of any of Trump's rallies. Polls and data can be manipulated in many ways to get the desired end result.It's widely reported that the Harris /Walz team is paying and busing thousands of people long distances to her rallies. Don't provide a tainted Reuters story to try and refute that.
How about a fact check or is that not something you do?
https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/buses...024-09-23/
https://yandex.com/search/pad/?text=bus+...&lr=102627
Reuters is tainted? Oh right, any other narrative with evidence is tainted, I forgot.
Of the 5,003 mobile devices at Kamala Harris's post-debate rally in North Carolina, 3,600 originated from Georgia. The majority were from Atlanta, while just under one-sixth were from Savannah.
https://www.offthepress.com/data-reveals...s-rallies/
You have failed to address my other point. Why weren't the mobile devices at Trump's rallies also geo-locate-pinged for an unbiased view of both scenarios?
There have never been accusations that Trump's rally crowds are not genuine, but they are hundreds of accounts of Harris's team recruiting, paying and busing people to her events.